A number of state legislatures and organizations put barriers between women and abortion care by directly interfering with a woman's medical care. Waiting period requirements make abortion care more difficult to get, especially for rural and low-income women. They require that a woman wait a specified amount of time before obtaining an abortion after her initial consultation. These laws insult women by presuming that they have not considered their decision carefully, and they impose real obstacles on getting abortion care. They may require two trips to the clinic, which may be hundreds of miles away, and each trip may require getting child care, transportation, and time off of work. Most waiting periods are 24 hours, but some are as long as 72 hours.
|
Texas Lawmakers Broker Quiet Agreement on Women's Health Funds; House Panel Approves 20-Week Ban |
|
N.H. House Rejects Bill Requiring Waiting Period, Signed Consent Before Abortions |
|
S.D. Gov. Signs Bill To Lengthen Waiting Period Requirement |
|
Tenn. Lawmakers Drop Ultrasound Bill, Focus on Ballot Measure Instead |
|
Texas Lawmaker Plans Bill To Overturn Pre-Abortion Waiting Period Law in Light of New Research |
Expand to view all articles on Abortion:<br.
This section provides a brief overview of significant cases impacting reproductive rights and health related to Abortion:<br.
|
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Carol E. Ball, M.D. v. Daugaard |
For more information, visit one of these helpful sites or resources:
Repro Health Watch — an exciting new edition of the Women’s Health Policy Report — compiles and distributes media coverage of proposed and enacted state laws and ballot initiatives affecting women's access to comprehensive reproductive health care, as well as litigation in response to those provisions.
